CO 2 injection injection injection injection injection injection strategies for enhanced oil recovery and geological strategies for enhanced oil recovery and geological strategies for enhanced oil recovery and geological strategies for enhanced oil recovery and geological strategies for enhanced oil recovery and geological strategies for enhanced oil recovery and geological strategies for enhanced oil recovery and geological strategies for enhanced oil recovery and geological strategies for enhanced oil recovery and geological strategies for enhanced oil recovery and geological strategies for enhanced oil recovery and geological strategies for enhanced oil recovery and geological strategies for enhanced oil recovery and geological strategies for enhanced oil recovery and geological strategies for enhanced oil recovery and geological strategies for enhanced oil recovery and geological strategies for enhanced oil recovery and geological strategies for enhanced oil recovery and geological strategies for enhanced oil recovery and geological strategies for enhanced oil recovery and geological strategies for enhanced oil recovery and geological strategies for enhanced oil recovery and geological strategies for enhanced oil recovery and geological strategies for enhanced oil recovery and geological strategies for enhanced oil recovery and geological sequestration in a tight reservoir: An experimental study sequestration in a tight reservoir: An experimental study sequestration in a tight reservoir: An experimental studysequestration in a tight reservoir: An experimental study sequestration in a tight reservoir: An experimental studysequestration in a tight reservoir: An experimental study sequestration in a tight reservoir: An experimental study sequestration in a tight reservoir: An experimental studysequestration in a tight reservoir: An experimental study sequestration in a tight reservoir: An experimental studysequestration in a tight reservoir: An experimental studysequestration in a tight reservoir: An experimental studysequestration in a tight reservoir: An experimental studysequestration in a tight reservoir: An experimental studysequestration in a tight reservoir: An experimental studysequestration in a tight reservoir: An experimental study sequestration in a tight reservoir: An experimental study sequestration in a tight reservoir: An experimental studysequestration in a tight reservoir: An experimental study sequestration in a tight reservoir: An experimental studysequestration in a tight reservoir: An experimental study sequestration in a tight reservoir: An experimental studysequestration in a tight reservoir: An experimental study sequestration in a tight reservoir: An experimental study sequestration in a tight reservoir: An experimental study sequestration in a tight reservoir: An experimental study sequestration in a tight reservoir: An experimental studysequestration in a tight reservoir: An experimental study sequestration in a tight reservoir: An experimental studysequestration in a tight reservoir: An experimental studysequestration摘要
鉴于全球致密和超致密油藏的开发、化石能源需求的不断增长以及CO2大量排放等环境问题,CO2封存/提高采收率技术在油藏开发过程中受到了广泛关注。然而,与相关技术在常规油藏中的成熟应用不同,在致密储层中进行CO2提高采收率和地质封存的有效性仍有待研究。以鄂尔多斯盆地延长组超低渗(<1milli-Darcy)岩心样品为研究对象,研究了不同注入方式对同时进行CO2提高采收率和地质封存的有效性影响。采用连续注气、水气交替注入和循环注气三种注气策略进行了实验,开展了非混相和混相条件下的岩心驱替实验。此外,为了研究致密岩心采油和碳封存的潜在机理,利用储层岩石和流体进行了界面张力、黏度、接触角和恒质膨胀试验。研究发现,水气交替注入在同时实现高采收率和高效CO2封存方面优于连续注气。然而,与其他注气方式相比,循环注CO2是提高致密储层采收率最有效的方法。
|
@ 2023 版权所有 中国地质图书馆 (中国地质调查局地学文献中心)
京ICP备 05064591号 京公网安备11010802017129号
建议浏览器: 火狐、谷歌、微软 Edge、不支持 IE